Federal workers planning sabotage of the Trump administration


Conservative talk show host Mark Levin is very fond of saying that when liberals win elections, they run the country, and when they lose elections, they also run the country. That's because liberals control much of the media, judiciary, and especially the bureaucracy regardless of who wins the election.

Bureaucrats in the federal government, unhappy with the results of the election, feel they should be the ones to decide how America is run, and they are plotting their resistance to President Trump.

At the Environmental Protection Agency, a group of scientists strategized this past week about how to slow-walk President Trump’s environmental orders without being fired.

Click here to see the rest of this article
President Trump is going to have the EPA enforce fewer regulations. How do you slow-walk less enforcement? It sounds like liberal-speak for directly disobeying orders of the chief executive.

At the Treasury Department, civil servants are quietly gathering information about whistle-blower protections as they polish their résumés.

I think whistle-blowing is a euphemism for leaking government information. This entire episode is in liberal-speak and requires subtitles, like a foreign film. As for the traitorous civil servants, instead of polishing their resumes they should be packing an emergency travel bag in case they need to abruptly head to the Ecuadorian embassy for an extended stay.

At the United States Digital Service — the youthful cadre of employees who left jobs at Google, Facebook or Microsoft to join the Obama administration — workers are debating how to stop Mr. Trump should he want to use the databases they made more efficient to target specific immigrant groups.

Government employees plotting to sabotage government databases. And they tell the New York Times. They're not even afraid.

It's so bad that federal workers get triggered even hearing the name of Steve Bannon.

“At that moment, when folks heard the name Steve Bannon, it was like a punch in the gut. It became so real,” said the employee, who declined to be identified for fear of reprisals.

Hey, to any federal employees reading this article, listen up: Stephen Bannon!

Stephen Bannon! (Pow!)

Stephen Bannon! (Pow!)

Stephen Bannon! (Ug!)

On Monday, about 100 employees at the [EPA] agency’s Chicago office, which oversees the enforcement of environmental regulations in five Midwestern states, used their lunch hour to protest the Senate’s confirmation of Scott Pruitt, the Oklahoma attorney general, to lead the agency. Mr. Pruitt was a fierce critic of its mission under Mr. Obama.

One anonymous Twitter user created “@WhitehouseLeaks,” with a purported mission to reveal the secret workings of the Trump administration from within the West Wing.

At the Defense Department, where uniformed men and women work with civilians, several rank-and-file employees expressed outrage that Mr. Trump would announce the travel ban at the Pentagon, a building filled with people from different faiths and countries.

Defense Department employees are outraged that President Trump is attempting to secure our nation from unvetted foreigners? And the Defense Department is filled with people from different countries? I would hope not. I would hope they are all Americans.

If they were doing this under Obama the media would treat them like the criminals they are, not heroes. Federal employees who are openly bold enough to tell journalists that they are plotting to sabotage a duly elected President should be investigated and prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

[originally in AT]



Related articles:
The smartest way to draft an executive order regarding entry restrictions

A legal analysis of the Ninth Circuit's dangerous usurpation of presidential power

Neil Gorsuch confirms that Trump's attacks on judiciary are working





The smartest way to draft an executive order regarding entry restrictions


President Trump is going to issue a new executive order regarding entry restrictions after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a temporary restraining order on his original temporary ban on entry from seven Muslim countries. There are many ways to redraft his EO, but I am going to focus on two of the smartest strategies.
CONTINUE READING

Related articles:
A legal analysis of the Ninth Circuit's dangerous usurpation of presidential power

The truth behind the underreporting of terrorist incidents

"Muslim ban" injunction is a judicial coup against President Trump




A legal analysis of the Ninth Circuit's dangerous usurpation of presidential power


Previous I wrote at length how Federal District Judge James Robart violated the constitution in issuing a TRO (temporary restraining order) against President Trump's temporary entry ban for citizens of seven countries. Now a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed that stay.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
The truth behind the underreporting of terrorist incidents

"Muslim ban" injunction is a judicial coup against President Trump

Homeland Security employee reveals big gaps in vetting process



Ivanka Trump vs Michelle Obama on Magazine Covers


We have a new first lady in town. And no I don't mean Melania Trump. It's clear that Ivanka Trump has become the de facto first lady, for publicity purposes. And we all know that a major role for first ladies is to grace the cover of magazines. Michelle Obama appeared on so many of them, that some people rushed to their ophthalmologist's office with eye strain. But Ivanka has already appeared on her share of covers too. So the important question arises, who is more charismatic in print?
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
The vastly overrated Mary Tyler Moore Show

No one in the new Star Wars film looks like me

Feminists complain Wonder Woman's costume too revealing



Are you concerned that Neil Gorsuch belongs to a far-left church?


President Obama was criticized by Republicans, and rightly so I believe, for attending a church lead by Jeremiah Wright, who repeatedly criticized the United States for being, in his own opinion, an evil terrorist nation. People wondered, how could Obama sit through sermons like that, year after year? Didn't that mean that at the very least Obama didn't have any serious problems with what Wright was saying?
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Neil Gorsuch confirms that Trump's attacks on judiciary are working

NYC invaded by Buddhist monk imposters





Neil Gorsuch confirms that Trump's attacks on judiciary are working


All of us reading about President Trump's attacks on the overreaching judiciary are all thinking the same thing: are the attacks working? Thankfully, Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch confirms that they are.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Which is better, a president who criticizes the police, or Nordstrom's?

Trump should disregard clearly unconstitutional court orders

NYT tries to humiliate Trump by claiming he takes female hormones for hair



Which is better, a president who criticizes the police, or Nordstrom's?


President Trump is being criticized for making critical comments of Nordstrom's, which just dropped his daughter's product lines. Nordstrom claims they are dropping her products due to economic reasons, but it is a big coincidence that Nordstrom, TJ Maxx, Marshalls, and Neiman Marcus and other retailers are dropping Trump products just as President Trump took office. The fact is that Nordstrom's and other stores fears pressure from the Left for selling Trump branded products and so are proactively caving in to pressure. One wonders if President Obama had sold an Obama branded marijuana cigarette, if stores in California and Colorado would be as quick to drop his product line when he became president. Probably not.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Trump should disregard clearly unconstitutional court orders

NYT tries to humiliate Trump by claiming he takes female hormones for hair

Trump considers deporting immigrants on welfare



The truth behind the underreporting of terrorist incidents


President Trump initially said the media didn't report some terrorist incidents, which was quickly clarified to mean that they underreported them. The New York Times released a long list of terrorist attacks they had covered in their reporting to counter Trump's claim.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Why do Super Bowl ads feature hard-left propaganda?

NYT tries to humiliate Trump by claiming he takes female hormones for hair

Should Trump deny WH press passes to media who collaborated with Clinton?



Trump should disregard clearly unconstitutional court orders


The federal courts are making a power grab early in President Trump's term. Trump's executive order, a temporary entry ban from seven dangerous countries, was modest in scope, and had ample precedent: Obama had temporarily stopped immigration from Iraq, and Jimmy Carter from Iran. Historically the President has been given a very wide latitude when it comes to matters of national security, and the decision of who to let into our country is clearly a national security matter.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
NYT tries to humiliate Trump by claiming he takes female hormones for hair

Trump considers deporting immigrants on welfare

Trump blamed for not letting refugees needing expensive treatments into America



Why do Super Bowl ads feature hard-left propaganda?


Once again we have the Super Bowl and once again the big, megacompanies are spending big bucks... to push hard-left agendas.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
NYT tries to humiliate Trump by claiming he takes female hormones for hair

Should Trump deny WH press passes to media who collaborated with Clinton?

Should conservatives feel sad for Gawker's shutdown?



"Muslim ban" injunction is a judicial coup against President Trump


Federal district Judge James Robart of Seattle ordered a complete, nationwide temporary restraining order against President Trump's temporary ban on visitors from seven Middle Eastern countries. If you read the ruling as I have, you can see this is clearly unconstitutional on its face, and constitutes a judicial coup against President Trump and the executive branch.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Homeland Security employee reveals big gaps in vetting process

Time running out for Hijabi refugee who wants to give birth in America

Should Iraqi interpreters be entitled to US citizenship?




Next Page





Search Topic Areas
o Donald Trump
o Best articles
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Hairy feminists
o Gay agenda
o Gun control
o Illegal aliens
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda




NewsMachete.com Copyright 2015
Feedback


Who is NewsMachete?

Privacy policy
Search Topic Areas
o Donald Trump
o Best articles
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Hairy feminists
o Gay agenda
o Gun control
o Illegal aliens
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda