Preposterous "Breakfast Date Rape" case shows the extremes of liberal hysteria



May I ask you a provocative question? Have you ever been raped? Specifically, have you ever been raped, and then invited your would-be rapist to spend the night with you afterwards, and then had breakfast with your attacker the following morning, and then, some time later, when the alleged rapist did not call you as he promised he would, decide you were raped?

This is not a purely theoretical question, but rather is one of the cases spotlighted by the New York Times to show the need for greater prosecution of "date rape". The Obama Administration felt that there was an epidemic of underreported "date rape" on college campuses. (Incidences of reported rape were low... and therefore, underreported. If you haven't learned how to think like a liberal, it's never too late to start!)

And so the federal government used its rather amorphous powers under Title IX to press colleges into more aggressive action. Specifically, Title IX is

the federal law that prohibits gender discrimination in schools that receive public funds

What, you may ask, does gender discrimination have to do with prosecution of alleged rapes? Well, not much. But perhaps if you strain you can find a shadow or a penumbra of the law (the same magic words used to find the non-existent right to abortion in the Constitution) which implies a power to impress colleges into prosecuting more men for alleged date rape.

In 2011, following an investigation by NPR and the Center for Public Integrity on campus assault, the Obama administration decided to act. The Office for Civil Rights sent a “dear colleague letter” reminding colleges that sexual harassment and assault create an environment so hostile that women’s access to education is jeopardized, violating their civil rights.... A subsequent clarification of the letter created no uniform policy for how schools should adjudicate cases, but it offered recommendations like having schools inform students that drinking “never makes the survivor at fault for sexual violence” and discouraging colleges from allowing either party to directly cross-examine the other in investigations. Schools that failed to uphold standards risked losing federal funds.

Schools, under pressure, started prosecuting men using lower standards of proof:

The most widespread criticism was that the letter forced schools to lower their standard of proof when assessing claims, to the “preponderance of evidence” standard commonly used in civil lawsuits. Unlike the higher standard used in some civil trials, which require “clear and convincing evidence,” or the highest standard used in criminal trials, which require certainty “beyond reasonable doubt,” preponderance is often described as 50.01 percent certainty of guilt. If an accused student is found more likely than not to have committed the offense, he or she is “responsible,” in the parlance of campus hearings. While there were exceptions before 2011 — schools that used “clear and convincing” or, in a few instances, “beyond reasonable doubt” — preponderance was used in about 80 percent of colleges that had any fixed standard.

Which brings us to the case of the breakfast date rapist.

At Kennesaw State University, one woman found that as the Georgia debate around Title IX grew, her case was caught up in the furor. According to her complaint, early one morning in February 2016, she was raped by a male friend, when consensual fooling around ended in nonconsensual intercourse that she explicitly refused. At first, she told me, she thought her friend had merely “disrespected” her clear line. She let him spend the night, and in the morning they ate breakfast, making plans to meet later. The man didn’t call, and the woman, troubled, talked to friends, who told her she was describing rape.

The man was suspended, but the Times was upset because under the Trump administration, the Department of Education is not pressuring colleges as Obama once did to convict accused men based on lower standards of guilt, and the man's suspension was reversed. As Georgia state rep. Earl Ehrart said:

“This is the second of the absolutely ridiculous cases I was concerned about. I label this one ‘breakfast with a rapist’ made for TV absurdity.” He noted.... his belief that “with a new administration in D.C., the guidance letters are now garbage, and the threat of federal funding is off the table.”

For most crimes, liberals are the first to say that leniency should be shown and the accused should be given the benefit of every doubt. Except when it comes to the nebulous, murky matter of "date rape". The fact is that there is already an agency that handles "date rape" besides the federal government. It's called the police. But the Obama Administration didn't find that police and local prosecutors were taking enough cases. That's because police and prosecutors adhered to the standard of "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt", which is impossible to prove in cases like the "breakfast date rape".

Now Trump, and by extension his Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos, are taking heat for going back to the old standard, of innocent until proven guilty. Liberals are so disconnected from reality that they are using the example of the "breakfast date rape" to show that Trump is insensitive to the alleged date rape of women on campus. If this were any other crime--drug usage, drug dealing, drunk driving by illegal aliens, or armed robbery--the Times would be making every kind of excuse for the accused. But since this is a crime against a gender, that makes it political, and the Times effortlessly switches over to "guilty before proven innocent" even for ridiculous cases such as this one. It's comical to realize how out of touch the newspaper is to highlight this case as a supposed injustice to the "victim", whose behavior would have made it absolutely impossible to prosecute her alleged attacker in any court of law.



Related articles:
Women's prisons control bad girls with tampon reward system

Feminists worry "Pussy hats" marginalize men disguised as women

Women marines outraged soldiers watched their sex videos








The mysterious resignation of a senior globalist at the NSC


Dina Powell is the deputy National Security Advisor. That's a pretty senior rank. That means that many times she briefs President Trump personally.
CONTINUE READING

Related articles:
Should Breitbart have fired a reporter who blamed attacks on Muslims?

Guess how liberals reacted to the Islamic attack in London!

Trump admitting Islamist refugees at an accelerated rate




How to use betting markets to take money from liberals


Are you sure Donald Trump will be President until at least the end of 2018? Are you really, really, sure? If so, you can make money on it. Betting markets like Predictit.com allow you to bet on political topics.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Trump quietly doubling number of refugees entering US

What message did Trump write to God?

Trump only seeking $1.6 billion for border wall in 2018



Amazon offering 50% off on Prime Membership for people on food stamps


Amazon is offering a great deal--50% off its Prime Membership, which offers free, two day delivery for a wide variety of goods, as long as you can show that you buy things with someone else's money, namely an EBT card.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
If there are "Well-to-do", are there also "Well-to-don'ts"?

Welfare rolls in North Carolina drop 55% after drug testing

When required to work, most welfare recipients vanish



What's happening to Breitbart?


The NYT has a story claiming Breitbart's traffic is down 50% and its advertising base is down nearly 90%.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
NYT tries to torpedo purchase of TV stations by conservatives

Is it national news if it rains in Florida?

Roger Ailes, serial molester of conservatives, steps down from Fox News



Should Breitbart have fired a reporter who blamed attacks on Muslims?


Breitbart has fired reporter Katie McHugh after she tweeted the following:
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Guess how liberals reacted to the Islamic attack in London!

Trump admitting Islamist refugees at an accelerated rate

Why is Trump's Defense Department celebrating Ramadan?



Should a liberal with a gunshot wound to the head have a warship named after her?


Hillary Clinton plans to attend the launching ceremony of a warship. But not just any warship, but the USS Gabrielle Giffords, named for the liberal congresswoman who was shot in the head. For Hillary, every decision is still about "wimmen and gurls", but it raises the larger question about whether it is appropriate to name a warship after Giffords.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Laughable and Sad: Gun-Free Ohio State advised students to "Run, Hide, Fight"

Lesbians simulate sex acts to protest law abiding gun owners

Little boy eaten by Alligators at Disneyworld; Obama calls for more gun control



African witch doctors stealing baby parts to help politicians win elections


African moms have to be extra protective of their babies, especially during election time, because witch doctors steal their babies' body parts and use them to allegedly help politicians win elections.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
No word, not even "N*gger", should be banned

Ancient Egyptians looked more like Eddie Fisher than Eddie Murphy

Trump planning to trim "Get Whitey!" bureaucracy



No word, not even "N*gger", should be banned


There is something both delicious and disturbing in watching the loathsome Bill Maher apologize for saying the "N word" on his show, when he joked to Senator Ben Sasse that he could never work in the fields of a farm because he would be more comfortable as a "house n*gger":
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Ancient Egyptians looked more like Eddie Fisher than Eddie Murphy

Trump planning to trim "Get Whitey!" bureaucracy

Supreme Court decides only Democrats can use race in gerrymandering



Guess how liberals reacted to the Islamic attack in London!


When Muslims kill people "in the name of Allah", how to liberals react? We know they don't equate the terrorist act with the Islamic religion. So what do they say? Because it is important to know how liberal think, I have donned a hazmat suit and dived deeply into the comments section of the HuffPo and the WaPo to enlighten you.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Trump admitting Islamist refugees at an accelerated rate

Why is Trump's Defense Department celebrating Ramadan?

Visas given to visitors from Arab countries down 30% under Trump



Trump admitting Islamist refugees at an accelerated rate


The Trump administration is admitted 20% more refugees in May than it did in April, and many of them were Islamists from places like Syria, the Sudan, and Somalia.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Why is Trump's Defense Department celebrating Ramadan?

Visas given to visitors from Arab countries down 30% under Trump

Trump sinking America deeper into unwinnable Afghanistan quagmire




Next Page





Search Topic Areas
o Donald Trump
o Best articles
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Hairy feminists
o Gay agenda
o Gun control
o Illegal aliens
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda




NewsMachete.com Copyright 2015
Feedback


Who is NewsMachete?

Privacy policy
Search Topic Areas
o Donald Trump
o Best articles
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Hairy feminists
o Gay agenda
o Gun control
o Illegal aliens
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda