Find out how liberal your federal circuit court is



A lot of attention is paid to the ideological balance of the Supreme Court, which is the ultimate arbiter of too many things in America nowadays. But the Supreme Court can only afford to hear a small number of cases. Most cases don't make it past the various circuit courts of appeal, and so the ideological makeup of these courts is important as well. Unfortunately, over eight years Obama has been packing them with leftists as much as he could. And yet, some circuit courts have better partisan balances than others. Here, then, is a list:

First Circuit (ME, NH, RI, MA): The First Circuit has four democrats and two republicans, and no vacancies. By the way, when I say "four democrats and two republicans" that is shorthand for four judges APPOINTED by Democrats and two judges APPOINTED by Republicans. I presume they are one and the same, but they may not always be. This is a solid leftist circuit and will be for some time to come.

Second Circuit (NY, VT): The Second Circuit has four R's and seven D's and two vacancies. Even if Trump fills both, Dems will still have an absolute majority. But, on the other hand, it's only New York and Vermont, so how much do we really care?

Third Circuit (PA, NJ, DE): The Third Circuit has five R's and seven D's and two vacancies. Trump appointed one of the R's. If the two vacancies are filled, the court could become evenly split.

Fourth Circuit (MD, WV, VA, NC, SC): The Fourth Circuit has five R's and ten D's and no vacancies. This will be a hard-left court for some time to come.

Fifth Circuit (TX, LA, MS): This circuit has 10 R's and five D's and two vacancies. Two of the R's were appointed by Donald Trump. Mysteriously, this circuit seems to have been protected by the rampage of leftists inflicted on the other circuit courts., and is one of the most conservative in the country. Don't mess with Texas.

Sixth Circuit (MI, OH, KY, TN): This circuit has eleven R's and five D's, and three of the judges were appointed by Donald Trump. Like the Fifth Circuit, it's an oasis of conservatism.

Seventh Circuit (WI, IL IN): This circuit has six R's and two D's and three vacancies. One of the R's was appointed by Donald Trump. Another surprisingly conservative court.

Eighth Circuit (ND, SD, NE, MN, IA, MO, AR): This court has nine R's, one D, and one vacancy. Trump appointed two judges here. Yet another conservative court. Does this surprise you? It surprises me.

Ninth Circuit (CA, WA, OR, ID, MT , MV, AZ, AK HI): The Ninth Circuit covers a huge area and there have been many proposals to break up the circuit into two, always resisted by the minority party who fears the majority party would pack the new court. The Ninth Circuit has a reputation for being a hard-left court, and that reputation is well-deserved, with seven R's and 18 D's and four vacancies. Even if Trump fills all the vacancies, this court will be to the left of the Comintern for some time to come.

Tenth Circuit (WY, UT, CO, KS, OK, NM): This court has five R's and seven D's and no vacancies. Trump appointed one of the R's. A close split, but no opportunity to improve at present.

Eleventh Circuit (AL, GA, FL): This court has four R's and 8 D's and no vacancies. Trump appointed one of them. It's surprising that Alabama and Georgia, very conservative states, are ruled by such a leftist circuit court.

DC Circuit (DC): The DC Circuit court covers the smallest geographical area but is really the second most powerful court after the Supreme Court because it hears cases based on regulations promulgated by federal agencies located in the District of Columbia, of which there are many. There are four R's, seven D's, and no vacancies. Trump appointed one judge. Unfortunately, there are no prospects for improvement any time soon.

There is also a Federal Circuit Court that covers things like patents which probably won't interest you so I won't talk about that.

What surprised me the most after examining this data is how few courts could shift from Trump appointments. Most circuit courts are already so far left or right and there are so few vacancies that Trump can really only affect the balance on the Third Circuit. Obviously this can change over time as vacancies appear, but the partisan balance of the circuit courts aren't going to change dramatically any time soon.

There are three important caveats to note.


1) Democrat=reliable liberal but Republican doesn't always equal reliable conservative. Every Democratic judge appointed always lives up to leftist ideals but Republican judges are not nearly as reliable on the conservative time. Over time, a certain percentage drift to the left, so if a circuit court has 7 R's and 5 D's, the partisan balance may be in favor of the Republicans, but in reality the ideological balance may be in favor of the Democrats.

2) Circuits with Democratic or Republican majorities can issue contrarian decisions. Most times cases are not heard "en banc", that is by the entire circuit. Most cases are heard by three judge panels chosen theoretically at random. So if a circuit has 10 D's and 5 R's, it is possible for a three judge panel to be composed of a majority of R's. Decisions of three judge panels can be challenged to the entire circuit, but as I've said, most cases aren't heard "en banc".

3) Many of you will ask, "Why can't Congress expand the number of vacancies on the circuit court and then fill them with conservatives?" Well, the answer is, they can. With a Republican House, Republican Senate, and Republican president, such a bill can be passed. But it won't be. The reality is that the balance of the circuit courts will not be changed for some time to come, but the good news is that a surprising number of the circuits are already conservative.

[originally in AT]



Related articles:
GOP giving individual Democrats veto power over judges

Are you concerned that Neil Gorsuch belongs to a far-left church?

Neil Gorsuch confirms that Trump's attacks on judiciary are working








"The Last Jedi" micturates on Han, Luke, Leia, classic Star Wars


You know there is a strong divergence of opinion when "professional" movie reviewers almost universally praise the latest Star Wars movie, "The Last Jedi", while ordinary reviewers give the film about a 5 out of 10 rating, which is to say, not very good.
CONTINUE READING

Related articles:
No one in the new Star Wars film looks like me

Obama confiscates blasters from Stormtroopers during White House photo op

The most spoilerific review of The Force Awakens




Many American Jewish "leaders" deaf, blind, and dumb to Islamic Kristallnacht


Sweden has been importing an enormous number of Muslim immigrants. (Perhaps they don't like blondes anymore?) The results have been predictable, and catastrophic, but especially for the Jewish people who live there.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
The mysterious resignation of a senior globalist at the NSC

Should Breitbart have fired a reporter who blamed attacks on Muslims?

Guess how liberals reacted to the Islamic attack in London!



The very best stories of how Rex Tillerson is destroying the State Department


Rex Tillerson should be the darling of the liberal media. He supported sticking with the Iran deal, which basically allows Iran to develop nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. He opposed stating the obvious, that Israel's capital is Jerusalem. And he supported the ridiculous Paris climate change treaty.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Can America function with less than 33 assistant secretary of states?







Preposterous "Breakfast Date Rape" case shows the extremes of liberal hysteria


May I ask you a provocative question? Have you ever been raped? Specifically, have you ever been raped, and then invited your would-be rapist to spend the night with you afterwards, and then had breakfast with your attacker the following morning, and then, some time later, when the alleged rapist did not call you as he promised he would, decide you were raped?
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Women's prisons control bad girls with tampon reward system

Feminists worry "Pussy hats" marginalize men disguised as women

Women marines outraged soldiers watched their sex videos



The mysterious resignation of a senior globalist at the NSC


Dina Powell is the deputy National Security Advisor. That's a pretty senior rank. That means that many times she briefs President Trump personally.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Should Breitbart have fired a reporter who blamed attacks on Muslims?

Guess how liberals reacted to the Islamic attack in London!

Trump admitting Islamist refugees at an accelerated rate



How to use betting markets to take money from liberals


Are you sure Donald Trump will be President until at least the end of 2018? Are you really, really, sure? If so, you can make money on it. Betting markets like Predictit.com allow you to bet on political topics.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Trump quietly doubling number of refugees entering US

What message did Trump write to God?

Trump only seeking $1.6 billion for border wall in 2018



Amazon offering 50% off on Prime Membership for people on food stamps


Amazon is offering a great deal--50% off its Prime Membership, which offers free, two day delivery for a wide variety of goods, as long as you can show that you buy things with someone else's money, namely an EBT card.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
If there are "Well-to-do", are there also "Well-to-don'ts"?

Welfare rolls in North Carolina drop 55% after drug testing

When required to work, most welfare recipients vanish



What's happening to Breitbart?


The NYT has a story claiming Breitbart's traffic is down 50% and its advertising base is down nearly 90%.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
NYT tries to torpedo purchase of TV stations by conservatives

Is it national news if it rains in Florida?

Roger Ailes, serial molester of conservatives, steps down from Fox News



Should Breitbart have fired a reporter who blamed attacks on Muslims?


Breitbart has fired reporter Katie McHugh after she tweeted the following:
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Guess how liberals reacted to the Islamic attack in London!

Trump admitting Islamist refugees at an accelerated rate

Why is Trump's Defense Department celebrating Ramadan?



Should a liberal with a gunshot wound to the head have a warship named after her?


Hillary Clinton plans to attend the launching ceremony of a warship. But not just any warship, but the USS Gabrielle Giffords, named for the liberal congresswoman who was shot in the head. For Hillary, every decision is still about "wimmen and gurls", but it raises the larger question about whether it is appropriate to name a warship after Giffords.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Laughable and Sad: Gun-Free Ohio State advised students to "Run, Hide, Fight"

Lesbians simulate sex acts to protest law abiding gun owners

Little boy eaten by Alligators at Disneyworld; Obama calls for more gun control




Next Page





Search Topic Areas
o Donald Trump
o Best articles
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Hairy feminists
o Gay agenda
o Gun control
o Illegal aliens
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda




NewsMachete.com Copyright 2015
Feedback


Who is NewsMachete?

Privacy policy
Search Topic Areas
o Donald Trump
o Best articles
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Hairy feminists
o Gay agenda
o Gun control
o Illegal aliens
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda