Kirsten Gillibrand tacks hard left for 2020 to compensate for extreme whiteness



New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has a problem. She wants to be the Democratic nominee for President in 2020.

And she's white.

Not only is Gillibrand white, but she's extremely white. She's so white that even Hillary Clinton looks almost Hispanic by comparison.

That's not an asset in a competitive Democratic primary. It used to be that being a woman was sufficiently virtuous. No longer. Gillibrand has to compete against candidates from other identity groups. Cory Booker is a minority, Kamala Harris is a minority, and even though Elizabeth Warren isn't a minority, she does play one on TV.

So Gillibrand is tacking hard left to compensate. She was formerly a moderately conservative Democratic congresswoman from upstate New York, until she was appointed to a vacant Senate Seat by the then-governor, David Paterson, a blind black adulterous former cocaine user whose resume full of multiple identity group memberships dazzled New Yorkers throughout the state.

Gillibrand, who used to brag about keeping a gun under her bed and advocated deporting illegal aliens and making English the official language of America, now sings to a very different tune. When she got elected to the Senate she saw she got a lot of media attention when she repeatedly told her "fat shaming story", her claim that then Senator Daniel Inouye allegedly told her "Don’t lose too much weight now. I like my girls chubby!"

After that, Gillibrand latched on to every offense, real and perceived, against women in the non-Islamic world to attract the attention of the media. And it worked, for a while, to raise her profile.

But as the status of women as a virtue group has declined, and the status of minority and other identity groups have risen in the Democratic Party, Gillibrand has had to up her game.

The New York Times, of all places, wrote a remarkable piece cataloging Gillibrand's rapid evolution from moderate to hard-left. It's hard to think of a reason they would publish such a damaging piece about her, except perhaps that they too, like other Democratic core groups, find Gillibrand's uncompromising whiteness to be disqualifying for a presidential nominee.

So here's what Gillibrand stands for now:

1) She wants to impose additional taxes on people who buy stocks. Why? Because, as any bank robber will tell you, that's where the money is.

2) She wants to guarantee a government job for every citizen. Think of millions of Americans, doing nothing of consequence, and being paid very handsomely for it. And then think of who they will support for President in the following election.

3) Gillibrand wants the financially debt ridden post office to open a bank in every branch. A federally financed and run bank. What could go wrong?

4) She wants to legalize marijuana, probably to improve productivity and job satisfaction for those in #2 above.

5) Gillibrand promises to reject all corporate PAC money; the days of Gillibrand accepting five million dollars in corporate donations is officially over.

6) She promises "Medicare for all", and plans to expand the program before it becomes insolvent.

7) Gillibrand wants to abolish ICE. Everyone from all over the world can come into the country, get a government job (see #2 above), get a government loan (see #3 above), get some weed (see #4 above) get free medical care (#6 above) and vote in elections as soon as they can pass the driving test at the local Department of Motor Vehicles (or maybe there will be exemptions for that as well).

Can Gillibrand's hard left turn overcome her naturally white disposition? Democrats can get the hard left platform already, in addition to shades of Obama if they turn to Cory Booker or Kamala Harris.

Exit question:

1) Could Gillibrand be more competitive if she finds some remote Hispanic or African-American in her distant family tree, or joins another identity group like lesbians or "trangendered men"?

[originally in AT]









Is Elizabeth Warren having an affair with New York Magazine?


Is Elizabeth Warren having an extra-marital affair with New York Magazine? I only ask because the NYM just published a 7,200 word opus to the American Native senator from Massachuetts that reads like a deranged love letter, seeking to turn an old, wrinkled leftist with even older, more wrinkled leftist ideas, into the fresh young face for America in 2020.
CONTINUE READING

Related articles:
Elizabeth Warren's book says socialism will work like it's never worked before

WaPo writes article admiring Elizabeth Warren's bony arms

Elizabeth Warren's analysis of the GOP conservatives can agree with




Libs demand tax cut for tampons


Whoever said that feminists weren't supply siders? Feminists and their fellow travellers are demanding that tampons be tax free.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
The end of the swimsuit competition is part of the war on heterosexual men

Which Harvey Weinstein movie title best describes Harvey Weinstein situation?

Feminist Prof. says husband's repeated requests for sex were violations



Young, dumb teenage girls form doomsday cult to fight "global warming"


The bestselling computer game of 2018 is called Far Cry 5. It features a militant doomsday cult which takes over parts of America and tries to forcibly convince everyone that the world is about to end. That could never happen for real in America, could it?
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Alaska extremely worried that climate change will bring warmer temperatures

De Blasio using frightening, Orwellian tactics to sue oil companies for bad weather

Companies which "cause" global warming furious Trump won't penalize them



Lib racists salivate over "brown skinned" UC Merced, ignoring the 37% graduation rate


Liberals love skin color, as long as it is not white. That's why the New York Times had a glowing article about the University of California at Merced, which is majority hispanic.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Here's how Harvard discriminates against Whites and Asians

New tax on "the rich" pleases conservatives, infuriates liberals

Liberal professor beaten by leftist students blames Trump



Judicial nominee pulled because of opposition to "Multiculturalism"


President Trump was forced to pull the nomination of Ryan Bounds for a federal circuit judgeship on the Ninth Circuit because of the judge's writings decades ago against so-called "multiculturalism" while a student at Stanford. GOP senators Tim Scott and Marco Rubio objected to the nominee's writings.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Uber COO offends "diversity", submits himself for thought reform

Papa John's founder resigns for saying someone else used the "N word"

Only in Hollywood: White male director happy to be discriminated against



Europe, showing no understanding of antitrust, fines Google five billion dollars


Europe is very good at regulating. Less so at creating. That's why Europe has fined Google five billion dollars for allegedly monopolistic behavior related to Google's Android operating system on phones and tablet devices, while failing to produce continental alternatives of its own.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Lemonade stands teach kids all the wrong lessons about capitalism

On trade and tariffs, Donald Trump is right and Mark Levin is wrong

Libs demand more than $20 an hour delivering packages



When did America decide to defend Montenegro and the Baltic States?


Does anyone remember the public debate where America decided to defend Montenegro, by adding that nation to the NATO alliance? I don't.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Why do we have such a liberal Secretary of Defense?

America should shoot down aggressive Russian warplanes

Something is very wrong with the US Navy



Lemonade stands teach kids all the wrong lessons about capitalism


It was overcast, windy, and in the 50's yesterday morning as I drove my car down a city street and I saw two children sitting at a table across the street waving to me. They had no signage but they were obviously selling lemonade.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
On trade and tariffs, Donald Trump is right and Mark Levin is wrong

Libs demand more than $20 an hour delivering packages

The secret for bookstore survival in the Amazon.com era



The same liberal media called Reagan "war-monger" and Trump "accommodationist" on Russia


Many of you remember the 1980's. Ronald Reagan became President in the wake of the Iran hostage crisis, the Soviet placement of nuclear missiles in Eastern Europe, and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
When did Russia convince you to vote for Donald Trump?

Here's an idea for a National Endowment for the Arts Grant





On trade and tariffs, Donald Trump is right and Mark Levin is wrong


Even brilliant people are occasionally wrong, which explains why conservative thinker Mark Levin is confused about the effect of tariffs. Levin has spent many shows, such as the one on Friday, excoriating the Trump administration's policies of imposing tariffs on imported goods.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Libs demand more than $20 an hour delivering packages

The secret for bookstore survival in the Amazon.com era

How not to save a dying shopping mall




Next Page





Search Topic Areas
o Donald Trump
o Best articles
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Hairy feminists
o Gay agenda
o Gun control
o Illegal aliens
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda




NewsMachete.com Copyright 2015
Feedback


Who is NewsMachete?

Privacy policy
Search Topic Areas
o Donald Trump
o Best articles
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Hairy feminists
o Gay agenda
o Gun control
o Illegal aliens
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda