The unbelievable reasons why the Pentagon wants soldiers disarmed in the US



Last year radical muslim Nidal Hasan murders 13 unarmed American soldiers and wounds 30 others.

Thank you, George H.W. Bush!

Yesterday radical muslim Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez murders four unarmed American soldiers.

Thank you, George H.W. Bush!

Yes, it is dottering, senile, Republican-eviscerating former President Bush, we must thank for this, for it was he who put into place a regulation stating that American soldiers off the frontlines, for the most part, must be unarmed. (Clinton perpetuated it, but Bush started it.) That makes them sitting ducks for a single radical muslim with a gun who can casually go and shoot one soldier at a time, knowing they can't fire back.

It appears this “gun-free zone” type policy can actually be traced back toDepartment of Defense (DoD) Directive 5210.56, signed into effect in February 1992 by Donald J. Atwood, deputy secretary of defense under President George H.W. Bush. The controversial directive states that “it is DoD Policy” to “limit and control the carrying of firearms by DoD military and civilian personnel.”

The blood of the dead soldiers is on his hands. I'm sure as he lies in the hospital with a broken neck bone that he's not giving it a second thought.

But what is not widely known are the reasons why Bush signed this order. A Pentagon spokesman stated that the Pentagon is against US troops being armed except in combat situations:

...the Pentagon opposed the move for various reasons. “The first of which is safety,”

This is so upside down. The soldiers are safer if they are carrying guns. They are less safe if they are all disarmed, because they can be massacred by a radical muslim.

“Another reason is really the prohibitive cost of the training, the qualification requirements, recertification. "

What? Aren't soldiers, by definition, already trained to use firearms? This is the worst kind of sophistry!


“The final one is local requirements and other policy requirements, for example the Lautenberg requirement,” he said, referring to a 1996 amendment by the late Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) that prohibits those convicted of misdemeanor crimes from carrying a weapon.

This is ignorance of the worst kind. Federal bases and Federal employees are not subject to "local requirements". It's called federalism. Look it up!

As for the Lautenberg Amendment, does that mean soldiers convicted of misdemeanors can't carry weapons in times of war? Then what are they in the military for? Either they are trusted, in which case they should be able to carry all the time, or they aren't, in which case they shouldn't be in the military.

“So there are a lot of barriers to this idea, and the Department's position — and we've spelled this out before &a

Related articles:
If you have $500,000,000, you can buy 60 moderate Syrian Rebels!

Pentagon starving combat troops out of respect for Ramadan

Has Michelle Obama been subject to Islamic genital mutilation?








Should House Republicans have to pay "union dues" to the GOP?


Did you know that House Republicans are strongly pressured to pay dues to the GOP leadership? It is very reminiscent of unionized closed shops where thuggish union bosses force everyone to pay dues, even those who don't support the union.
CONTINUE READING

Related articles:
Paul Ryan Politically Transgenders into Nancy Pelosi, LGOP Community Approves

Why do McConnell and Boehner act like they have a Denny Hastert problem?

Obamacare and Amnesty would be dead if Republicans fought like this governor




Move over, Google Maps! Introducing the NYC Public Urination Map!


Now that New York City is decriminalizing public urination, New Yorkers of every stripe want to know where they can go to witness New York's version of the Old Faithful geyser, watching powerful stream of apple juice colored liquids gracing the noble streets of New York from powerful local spouts. Thankfully 21st century mapping technology has taken the guesswork out of this, as New York introduces its very first urination map! (Not to confuse this with, or to dethrone, San Francisco's solid human waste street map!)
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
The hottest NYC trend: luxury condos next to housing projects!

The latest amenity in luxury NYC housing: panic rooms

Would you give up sunlight to live in Manhattan?



Scott Walker walks back his statement on gay scout leaders


If you listen to Scott Walker talk long enough, you will always find yourself agreeing with something he says. For example, many conservatives agree with his comments yesterday saying the ban on gay scout leaders protected kids. And many liberals will agree with him today when he walked back those comments.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
NY Times worried Scott Walker's rightward shift will hurt election prospects

Scott Walker gives lip service to gay sex struggle

Scott Walker criticized for donation from wrong kind of racist group



Are drug companies using bogus studies to push statins?


On the whole, I love drug companies. They have created many wonderful drugs which have eased human suffering. But they are companies like any other business, which means their aim is to increase sales as much as possible, so caveat emptor!
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Rand Paul solicits donations from drug dealers

Medical marijuana found to be best treatment for marijuana addiction

House Republicans working hard to make heroin and cocaine safer



Iranian Death Cult + Nukes + ICBM's=Mass Genocide


Obama has approved a deal which essentially allows Iran to build nuclear weapons. It's not spelled out that way specifically, of course, but look at the details:
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Forget Obama. Republicans made the Iran nukes deal possible

Obama writing secret love letters to Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei

Iran punishing dog owners with 74 lashes



Forget Obama. Republicans made the Iran nukes deal possible


Mark Levin has been shouting until he is blue in the face that this truly awful nuclear deal with Iran has only been made possible with the help of Senate Republicans, who passed a bill (99-1, with Tom Cotton of Arkansas the only sane dissenter) making it nearly impossible to stop Obama's agreement with the Ayatollahs:
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Obama writing secret love letters to Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei

Iran punishing dog owners with 74 lashes

Should GOP Chairman Reince Priebus be deported?



You'll never guess where self-deportation of illegals actually works


"What are you going to do, deport 11 million people?" That's the typical question that racists like Jorge Ramos ask of any trembling Republican who dares to fail to vocally support immediate and unconditional mass amnesty for illegal aliens. But even when deportation is off the table, self-deportation, which Mitt Romney proposed, is also ridiculed. But self-deportation works, at least in the Dominican Republic:
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Does income inequality between Democrats and the illegals they bring in worry you?

Guilty liberal feels illegal alien entitled to his job

Jeb Bush says you can love a Mexican and control the border



How letting transvestites serve in the military will endanger American lives


The Pentagon is planning to let soldiers serve who are so-called "transgendered"--men who dress up as women or women who dress up as men.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Should employers be forced to hire transvestites?

Girl Scouts turn down $100,000 gift for excluding "boy-girls"

Fairy tales being used to teach toddlers about homosexuality



Guess how many minorities work in liberal environmental groups?


Republicans are constantly attacked for not having enough minorities in their elected ranks. But no one seems concerned that Democrats, who have 90%+ support from Blacks, somehow only manage to have one elected black senator (Corey Booker)--the same number as Republicans (Tim Scott). Republicans are always asked, "Why are you so unpopular with minorities?"
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Liberals blame slack black park attendance on white racism

Which Democrat does Atticus Finch remind you of?

How to call out the press for their blatant racism



Does income inequality between Democrats and the illegals they bring in worry you?


As someone concerned with income equality, I find it alarming that the gap between the rich and the poor is growing wider and wider. That's because the millions of illegal aliens Democrats are legalizing are dirt poor, and the more they bring in, the more "poor" poor people there are, and the more the gap between the rich and poor is exacerbated.
CONTINUE READING Related articles:
Guilty liberal feels illegal alien entitled to his job

Jeb Bush says you can love a Mexican and control the border

Do you think Hillary or Bernie Sanders live anywhere near illegal aliens?




Next Page





Search Topic Areas
o Donald Trump
o Best articles
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Hairy feminists
o Gay agenda
o Gun control
o Illegal aliens
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda




NewsMachete.com Copyright 2015
Feedback


Who is NewsMachete?

Privacy policy
Search Topic Areas
o Donald Trump
o Best articles
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Hairy feminists
o Gay agenda
o Gun control
o Illegal aliens
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda