One 9/11 survivor's experience


I remember 9/11.

When the first plane hit the World Trade Center, I was in my apartment about a block and a half away. I used to work for a law firm in the WTC, but even afterwards I still lived in nearby Battery Park City. When the first plane hit it sounded like a bus crashing into something.

I went outside to look, and I wasn't the only one. When I saw the building on fire, I foolishly went over to join a crowd watching on the other side of the street. I say foolishly, in retrospect, because if you see a building burning on fire, your first instinct should be to run away. But that thought didn't occur to me at the time. We didn't even know, yet, that it was a terrorist attack; it was thought that perhaps a plane had accidently crashed into 1 WTC. Remember, there was about a 20 minute gap between the first plane and the second one.

As I stood there looking up I saw parts of WTC destroyed but much of the building, especially lower down, was untouched. The thing I remember the most was the mountain of falling papers, falling out of the sky. I also saw people, standing on the edge of ruined building floors.

And then I saw the bodies, the people falling to their deaths. At first I thought that maybe air pressure had pushed them out, but I had arrived after the first plane had hit, so I don't think that was it. My theory, which I will never be able to prove, is that the flames were so intense that people instinctively chose to jump rather than be burned to death. I saw bodies falling. Not a lot, but enough of them.

And then the second plane hit 2 World Trade Center, a huge fireball exploded above and to the right of me. I was standing on the diagonal southwest corner; the plane hit from the southeast; if it had approached from the southwest, I'd probably be dead.

At that point we knew it was a terrorist attack, and everyone started running. There was broad panic because there was no way of knowing if there would be a third or forth plane that would dive down onto the crowds.

There was also no apparent escape. The burning buildings were blocking our escape to the north. And we were nearly at the southern tip of Manhattan, surrounded by water. So I ran east, to Chinatown. I know the exact time I arrived at the center of Chinatown, it was 9:59 AM. How do I know this? Because that is when the first tower collapsed. I saw it directly, unobstructed, framed between two sides of the street. It didn't lean over left, or right, but it simply went straight down, like an elevator, collapsing into itself. I remember the screams of the people around me who physically were unharmed.

I was actually rather fortunate because I was just outside the range of the toxic dust cloud. Others were not as fortunate.

I remember walking up the East Side Highway, which had been closed to traffic. I never saw a more well dressed crowd of refugees on foot.

I lived in my parents' basement for three months. My apartment building survived, but all my possessions were contaminated with asbestos and other chemicals. I remember going to J.C.Penny with a shopping cart and shopping for everything from scratch, as if I had just arrived on the planet Earth. All my possessions I had accumulated over decades were gone, all I had left were the clothes on my back. I remember going back to my apartment several weeks later in a hazmat suit and respirator, retrieving photos and a few books, going to a forest, and wiping them front and back, one at a time, over and over. I remember the air at the WTC was thick with the stench of death.

I remember how after the first plane hit, people in the 2 WTC were told not to evacuate and go back to work. No one was ever held responsible for this. I remember how Rudy Guiliani was hailed as a hero, when his decision to locate his emergency command center in the WTC hampered rescue efforts. I remember the smell of the WTC site, which cast a broad stench not just for days but weeks and months across Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, and New Jersey. I remember the coverups about the asbestos contamination.

I remember, shortly after 9/11, hearing execrable imans wailing in arabic on the radio to show that they were "good guys too" and thinking how utterly despicable they were. If my co-religionists had done this atrocity, I would expect ever representative of my religion to apologize, in English, until their voices gave out, not recite prayers of their own religion! I heard not a single apology from any Muslim. There were vast expressions of sympathy from the people of Europe, but virtually none from people in Muslim countries. Most Muslims did not commit 9/11, but a substantial minority supported the actions of those 19 Muslim killers. There was no mourning of any kind in Muslim countries. In fact many, like the Palestinians (in Gaza, and I remember press accounts of Muslims dancing on rooftops in New Jersey), celebrated the deaths of Americans.

I remember how George W. Bush was hailed for a hero, when his lax border policies had allowed these terrorists to overstay their visas. I remember his refusal to name the evil that committed this, radical Islam. The media not only refused to give the perpetrators a name, they bent over backwards to talk about imaginary oppression of Muslims after 9/11. I remember the image of Bush's homeland security advisor and spokeswoman going to a mosque and donning the Hijab, acting like subservient dhimmis about to be auctioned in the slave markets of Raqqa.

To this day the media still will not say we were attacked by Radical Islam. To this day the media still will not cover the subculture that exist in the Islamic culture that breeds this sort of hatred and evil. There was an uproar when the 9/11 Memorial Museum merely wanted to give the religion of the attackers. 14 years later, our current President also won't give our enemies a real name, just calling them nonsense names like "Daesh".

I am very angry with the mainstream Muslim culture which seems to at the very least tolerate and in too many quarters actually support this hideous evil. But I am equally angry with our past and current leaders, of both parties, who won't name the enemy, and still 14 years later, will not secure our borders. Even worse, George W. Bush did and Obama continues to import people from the very cultures who want us dead.

This was a terrible tragedy. But even worse, these 3000 died for nothing, because our leaders of both parties learned nothing from it, they won't fight an unrestrained war against it, and they won't protect our borders from it.

viagra manufacturer coupon 2016 site viagra 2016 coupon
free coupon for viagra viagra coupons from pfizer pet prescription discount card
discount coupon for viagra liberitutti.info prescription savings cards
cialis free coupon go cialis coupon
effects of abortion how to get abortion pill how to terminate a pregnancy
prescriptions coupons discount card for prescription drugs coupon prescription
the abortion pill click should abortion be illegal
cialis trial coupon asser.nl cialis online coupon
bystolic savings card program bystolic savings card bystolic discount card
manufacturer coupon for bystolic bystolic coupons
coupons and discounts abortion clinics in nashville tn abortion at 10 weeks
forest laboratories patient assistance daliresp patient assistance bystolic coupon save up to $20
gabapentin medication for sciatica gabapentin medication for sciatica gabapentin medication for sciatica
abortion images abortion pill experiences abortion clinics in colorado springs
abortion images go abortion clinics in colorado springs
cialis coupons from manufacturer prescription drugs coupons


Tell us what you think on Facebook.
Facebook Twitter Email


Related articles:
Who cares what Aleppo is?

NYT: opposing mass muslim migration is racist

Italy paying $300 million to Muslims not to become terrorists






A transcript of Christine Blasey Ford's FBI interview


What follows is a transcript of the FBI's interview with Christine Blasey Ford, given to me by a member of Senator Dianne Feinstein's office, who also assured me that the Senator's office was not involved in any way in the leak of the transcript.
CONTINUE READING


Christine Blasey Ford and the mysterious case of the missing bathroom


There was a subtle fact to be learned from Christine Blasey Ford's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday. No, not merely that she lied about being afraid to fly on airplanes so she could delay the hearing as long as possible.
CONTINUE READING


Christine Blasey Ford is now the leader of #MeTooFragile


Introducing the #MeTooFragile movement. It's an offshoot of the #MeToo movement, where women described what they claimed were sexual assaults in the workplace by the likes of Matt Lauer, Harvey Weinstein, Charlie Rose, Les Moonves and many others.
CONTINUE READING


Trump has not violated campaign finance laws, and here's why


The media is in a frenzy louder than feeding time at the zoo over the guilty pleas by Paul Manafort, the former Trump campaign manager, and Michael Cohen, Trump's (former) personal lawyer. Manafort's plea was unrelated to Trump. Cohen pleaded to tax evasion (also unrelated to Trump), but also two counts of working with Trump to violate campaign finance laws.
CONTINUE READING


The war on men, part 554: "Study" claims women are superior doctors


What if we did a study on the survival rates of patients who were treated by brunette doctors and blonde doctors? Wouldn't we find that patients did better with one set of doctors, either blondes or brunettes? In that case, wouldn't it mean that blondes or brunettes make better doctors?
CONTINUE READING


Dems promise to subordinate men if they retake the House


Democrats are promising that women will be the ones wearing the pants in the House if they get a majority in the November elections. That's because not only would Nancy Pelosi become speaker, but 35 women would head major committees and subcommittees. Voters who think women are better at ruling because of their gender are very, very politically aroused.
CONTINUE READING


New York Times erases 52 million white people from existence


The liberal media is in such a desperate hurry to change the demographics in this country that they can't wait for rhetoric to match reality. That's why it's understandable that The New York Times claimed that America is only 60% white. In case you had doubts, they even linked to a US Census website to back up their claim. How much more authoritative can you be than that?
The only problem is that the webpage the Times linked to does not say that the US population is 60% white; it says the US population is 76% white.
CONTINUE READING


How will liberals ruin Patrick Stewart's return to Star Trek?


78 year old Patrick Stewart, who played the wildly popular Captain Picard on the 1980's series Star Trek: The Next Generation, is returning to the role in a new Star Trek series.
CONTINUE READING


In Venezuela, drones make the government run more effectively


Drones have many uses. They can be used to monitor pipelines. Or crops. Or scan the countryside to track wild elk, or schools of fish in the sea.
CONTINUE READING


Pocahontas and Krazy Kamala shamelessly pander for Nutroots support


The "Netroots", which are derisively--and very accurately--called the "Nutroots" by some, are hard-left activists who provides the ready foot soldiers when the Left goes to electoral war. So would-be 2020 Democratic Presidential candidates appeared before them, each trying to appear more insanely left wing than the other, in an attempt to curry favor with the certifiably politically insane.
CONTINUE READING


Experts predict that men, women, & heterosexuals will sweep the midterm elections


The New York Times loves to write about identity groups, but only certain ones. So if you're heterosexual, a man who is certain he's a man, or, increasingly, a woman whose certain she's a woman, you're not going to find a lot of articles about your identity group in the Times, unless, of course, your identity group has been "oppressing" other identity groups.
CONTINUE READING


Let's all thank Sarah Jeong for showing us what liberals think of white people


Anti-white racism is endemic among liberals. For liberals, it is permissible to show disdain for white people in a way that would be totally, totally unacceptable to show for blacks, hispanics, or people of other "colors" of the liberal rainbow.
CONTINUE READING


The liberal media is the enemy of the rule of law and civil society


The liberal media is unused to anyone fighting back. It feels it should feel free to attack, defend, define, and distort as it sees fit, because of the First Amendment, but feels that anyone else exercising their First Amendment rights is "encouraging violence against the media". But what the media ignores is its own role in fomenting law-breaking and hatred.
CONTINUE READING


Lib media worries about crime wave in Mexico "caused" by America


We all know about cross-border crime on the Mexico border. But what we don't know, according to the liberal media, is that the crime is all one-way: Mexico does not export crime to America, but America causes crime in Mexico. A lot of it! Who knew?
CONTINUE READING


Brainwashed children being used to sue government over global warming


The Supreme Court allowed a lawsuit against the government to proceed alleging that the government has caused "global warming" which has harmed the teenage litigants. I think these kids are the environmental equivalent of suicide bombers, set to detonate within our legal system in the hopes of destroying industry and commerce.
CONTINUE READING


New Hampshire working hard to make state less white


New Hampshire has a problem. A big one. The state is 94% white. Business leaders claim that they have trouble filling jobs, so they are trying to attract people to the state--blacks, hispanics, and other minorities. Just not white people.
CONTINUE READING


NYT writes obits of long dead women & minorities, but no Holocaust victims


It is a rule that organizations can declare themselves virtuous by admitting that they were less than virtuous in the past (but note: this only works for liberal organizations). It's based on the tried and true self-criticism theory of Maoist China that (theoretically) allows people to reclaim their virtuousness by confessing past incorrect thoughts or modes of behavior. That's why The New York Times is making a big splash by saying that not only did it discriminate against women and minorities in the past in life, but even after they died, by not giving their deaths the publicity they deserved. Therefore, the Times had begun to write a series of obituari­­es for "notable" women and minorities who died a long time ago.
CONTINUE READING


Kirsten Gillibrand tacks hard left for 2020 to compensate for extreme whiteness


New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has a problem. She wants to be the Democratic nominee for President in 2020.
CONTINUE READING


Is Elizabeth Warren having an affair with New York Magazine?


Is Elizabeth Warren having an extra-marital affair with New York Magazine? I only ask because the NYM just published a 7,200 word opus to the American Native senator from Massachuetts that reads like a deranged love letter, seeking to turn an old, wrinkled leftist with even older, more wrinkled leftist ideas, into the fresh young face for America in 2020.
CONTINUE READING


Libs demand tax cut for tampons


Whoever said that feminists weren't supply siders? Feminists and their fellow travellers are demanding that tampons be tax free.
CONTINUE READING


Young, dumb teenage girls form doomsday cult to fight "global warming"


The bestselling computer game of 2018 is called Far Cry 5. It features a militant doomsday cult which takes over parts of America and tries to forcibly convince everyone that the world is about to end. That could never happen for real in America, could it?
CONTINUE READING


Lib racists salivate over "brown skinned" UC Merced, ignoring the 37% graduation rate


Liberals love skin color, as long as it is not white. That's why the New York Times had a glowing article about the University of California at Merced, which is majority hispanic.
CONTINUE READING


Judicial nominee pulled because of opposition to "Multiculturalism"


President Trump was forced to pull the nomination of Ryan Bounds for a federal circuit judgeship on the Ninth Circuit because of the judge's writings decades ago against so-called "multiculturalism" while a student at Stanford. GOP senators Tim Scott and Marco Rubio objected to the nominee's writings.
CONTINUE READING


Europe, showing no understanding of antitrust, fines Google five billion dollars


Europe is very good at regulating. Less so at creating. That's why Europe has fined Google five billion dollars for allegedly monopolistic behavior related to Google's Android operating system on phones and tablet devices, while failing to produce continental alternatives of its own.
CONTINUE READING


When did America decide to defend Montenegro and the Baltic States?


Does anyone remember the public debate where America decided to defend Montenegro, by adding that nation to the NATO alliance? I don't.
CONTINUE READING



Search Topic Areas
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Feminists
o Phony global warming
o Gun control
o Hillary Rotten Clinton
o Homosexual agenda
o Illegal aliens
o Jeb Bush
o Marco Rubio
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Rand Paul
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Scott Walker
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda




NewsMachete.com Copyright 2015
Feedback

RSS

Privacy policy