Trump should disregard clearly unconstitutional court orders


The federal courts are making a power grab early in President Trump's term. Trump's executive order, a temporary entry ban from seven dangerous countries, was modest in scope, and had ample precedent: Obama had temporarily stopped immigration from Iraq, and Jimmy Carter from Iran. Historically the President has been given a very wide latitude when it comes to matters of national security, and the decision of who to let into our country is clearly a national security matter.

And yet Judge James Robart made a radical move to reopen our borders to all these people from chaotic, ISIS infested places like Iraq, Yemen, and Syria, potentially putting American lives in danger. President Trump is appealing, but it will take a while for the appeal to wind its way through the Ninth Circuit and probably the Supreme Court. Judge Robart's reason is totally nonsensical, that the people of Washington state and Minnesota will suffer if people from the Sudan and Yemen aren't allowed to enter the country. The exact opposite is true.

That's why President Trump should label this decision an illegitimate, unconstitutional power grab, and disregard it. He can continue to appeal it, but make it clear that he is not going to comply with the restraining order, even temporarily.

Because, win or lose, the matter will not stop here. Trump's executive order is mild. He's going to have to issue a lot more substantive orders in the months to come. If Trump gives in to the politicized judiciary on this, they will smell blood in the water and challenge his later decisions.

Let's say that Trump actually wants to have a permanent ban on refugees from Syria or Iraq, for security reasons. A court could overturn it on the same grounds. Suppose Trump wants to stop all refugees coming to America for a year. A court could actually force Trump to let 100,000 or more refugees in, if Trump lets them. A court could stop Trump from doing enhanced vetting, claiming it discriminated against Muslims from ISIS infested countries. A court also stop Trump's border wall, claiming it would have a negative effect on a snail or a worm.

That's why Trump can't give in on his relatively limited executive order. If he does, he will give the courts a green light to keep America an open borders country.

Liberals will immediately claim that Trump is precipitating a constitutional crisis. But it is the courts which are precipitating such a crisis, by overreaching and claiming power of the executive branch for their own. When Obama was president and he chose not to enforce immigration law, federal courts were fine with it (Arizona vs. US). But when Trump is president and he chooses more stringent regulations, suddenly the courts feel they should have a veto power.

Courts don't have power to actually compel the executive to do anything. They can issue contempt citations but Trump can ignore those as well, if they are based on an illegal ruling. The only check, constitutionally speaking, on the president is impeachment by the congress, and that will never happen. Trump will take a lot of criticism for standing up to the courts, but this is what people elected him to do. If he stands up and makes it clear the courts are engaged in an illegal power grab, and that he is acting to protect the country as he promised when elected, public opinion will turn against the courts and they will be forced to back down.

Defying the courts is a very confrontational strategy, but they have engaged in an unconstitutional power grab and need to be called out for it. At a time when Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the Presidency, and still cannot put their own immigration controls in place, I think it is time to be confrontational. Otherwise elections won't matter and the media, the courts, and the bureaucracy will run the country into the ground regardless of who is elected to office.

[originally in AT]



Tell us what you think on Facebook.
Facebook Twitter Email


Related articles:
NYT tries to humiliate Trump by claiming he takes female hormones for hair

Trump considers deporting immigrants on welfare

Trump blamed for not letting refugees needing expensive treatments into America






US Public Schools educating Mexicans living in Mexico


I was reading an article about a Calexico, California private school on the border with Mexico which has a lot of students who pay tuition and come across the border every day from Mexico, and this seemingly innocuous sentence caught my eye:
CONTINUE READING


Liberals say 24 year olds should be tried as kids but vote as adults


Liberals have been gradually watering down the criminal justice system. They have launched a campaign to eliminate bail; they want drug addicts and drug dealers released from jail; and they certainly don't want 16 and 17 year olds accused of violent crimes to be charged as adults. Now in a new campaign, liberals are calling for 18 and 19 year olds and even people in their 20's to be charged as children, on the theory that their brains are not fully developed.
CONTINUE READING


Why does Trump's Sanctuary City policy have no teeth?


As Rick Moran noted, President Trump's threat to cut off funding for Sanctuary Cities really about a slice of funding of a very small $27 million dollar pie, because only one federal grant program would be subject to this rule. In practice a major city might lose a five or six figure grant. But that's pocket change for big cities with budgets in the hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. I was surprised to learn that Trump's threat to "cut off" funding doesn't even apply to all Justice Department grants, just the ones in this one tiny program.
CONTINUE READING


Trump welcomes Syrian illegal aliens Australia doesn't want


It's bad enough that Trump violated his own campaign promise and continues the illegal, unconstitutional "Dreamer" amnesty created by Obama. But now Trump is going out of his way to take the most dangerous illegal aliens that other countries don't want!
CONTINUE READING


Schumer plays Trump for a fool on Obamacare, Border Wall funding


Is there a passage in "The Art of the Deal" which states, "Give your final, best offer first. Then, when it's rejected, start negotiating from there with your opponent to give him everything he wants."? No? Because that's the strategy employed by President Trump in dealing with Chuck Schumer.
CONTINUE READING


"Science" marchers demand right to suck on taxpayers' teats


Are you against government funded science? If you are, you must be against all science! That's the conclusion of a large number of parasites and freaks who went to giant costume parties all around the world dressed in white coats to give them a patina of authority.
CONTINUE READING


Trump tells Dreamers to "Rest Easy"


President Trump, facing criticism for deporting exactly one "Dreamer" out of thousands, wanted to reassure children of illegal aliens, some of them in their 30's, that he was not going to deport them.
CONTINUE READING


Women's prisons control bad girls with tampon reward system


The New York Times spilled a goodly amount of ink talking about a very pressing issue: how tampons are used to reward women prisoners who are well behaved.
CONTINUE READING


Over 90% pass citizenship test, with answers given out in advance


Not just anyone can become a citizen of the United States. You first have to come into the country legally. Or illegally, and get amnesty. Then you have to apply for citizenship. And there is a brutal civics test! It is so difficult, that the government decided to give out the answers in advance.
CONTINUE READING


Mentally challenged border hopping shoplifting Dreamer deported


A so-called "Dreamer" was deported in February, the first Dreamer deported by the Trump Administration. President Trump, who had promised to end the unconstitutional program when running for president, went back on his promise after being elected, so the fact that even one Dreamer was deported is big news: that's one more Dreamer than Obama would have deported. You see, elections do matter!
CONTINUE READING


Elizabeth Warren's book says socialism will work like it's never worked before


Elizabeth Warren's new book, "This Fight is Our Fight", says that ordinary folk can do better economically if we only had more government control and less individual freedom.
CONTINUE READING


NEA taxpayer dollars helps artists feel good about themselves


The Washington Post tried to create what it thought was a clever agit/prop video in favor of the National Endowment for the Arts. Rather than showing NEA funding in big cities, the video explored funding largely in rural, conservative Indiana, represented by Republican congressmen. The hope was to whip up support among Republicans to save the NEA.
CONTINUE READING


Will Trump's reversal on Syrian refugees make him a one term President?


Supporters of Donald Trump, many of whom prominently campaigned for his election, are outraged by all the campaign promises he has reversed himself on--NATO, military action in Syria, the Federal Reserve, and the repeal of Obamacare, to name a few. But the straw that may break the camel's back is the issue of immigration and border security.
CONTINUE READING


Trump flipflops on Syria, NATO, China, the Fed, EXIM Bank


President Trump has changed his positions on Syria, NATO, China, the Fed, and the EXIM Bank (not to mention Obamacare repeal and prosecuting Hillary Clinton), all within the past few days.
CONTINUE READING


How many buzzwords can the liberal media use in one sentence?


I was reading a very poorly written LA Times article about North Carolina legislators introducing a bill to define marriage as between a man and a woman, and was surprised to read the following sentence:
CONTINUE READING


Lib Media desperate to declare White House egg roll a failure


The liberal media, so desperate for anti-Trump stories to feed into its narrative, is looking to use something as innocuous as the White House Easter egg roll as a yardstick to show "yet another" failure of the Trump administration. There are many legitimate grounds to criticize the Trump administration on ("Dreamers", more Syrian refugees, not supporting full Obamacare repeal), but an Easter egg roll? Come on!
CONTINUE READING


Medical Schools teaching doctors to give hormones to "transgendered" pre-teens


Medicine continues to advance! That may explain why Yale Medical School is teaching doctors in training to give hormones and puberty blockers to kids who claim they are "transgendered".
CONTINUE READING


Meet the liberals President Trump is considering for Chief of Staff


President Trump is reportedly considering replacing Reince Priebus, his chief of staff, and Steve Bannon, his chief strategist with a new chief of staff.
CONTINUE READING


Kushner "Democrats" rising, Bannon "nationalists" falling in Trump White House


Steve Bannon is said to be in the ideological fight of his life with President Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and not winning at the moment.
CONTINUE READING


Emmys under fire for limiting award categories to men and women


The Emmys are being criticized for limiting nominations to actors and actresses. In fact, if you go back in history and look at past recipients of awards, 100% have been either men or women. Obviously, there is a pattern of ingrained gender discrimination going on here. And one actress, or actor, or something in between, is calling them out on it.
CONTINUE READING


Trump considering screening visitors by their Facebook pages & phone records


There are reports that the Trump Administration is considering what it is calling "extreme vetting", which would seem to consist of asking potential visitors for their phones to see who they've been calling and access to their social media accounts.
CONTINUE READING


Trumpcare 2.0 isn't much better than its predecessor


President Trump said if the Ryan "Obamacare Lite" bill failed, that there would be no more efforts to repeal Obamacare. He then proceeded to trash the Freedom Caucus and to demand their ouster in the 2018 primaries.
CONTINUE READING


Jared Kushner is an embarrassment to this administration


What if former President Obama had sent Michelle to negotiate for him at a NATO summit? What if Bill Clinton had sent one of his half brothers to make peace in the Middle East?
CONTINUE READING


Feminists worry "Pussy hats" marginalize men disguised as women


A feminist with three names, Phoebe Maltz Bovy (I pity Mr., or Mrs. Bovy), writing in the WaPo worried that the use of "pussy hats" in anti-Trump demonstrations marginalizes men disguised as women, since men disguised as women do not have vaginas, and "pussy hats" are symbols of vaginas, as well as many feminists' secret desire to be groped by a man as wealthy as Donald Trump.
CONTINUE READING


Boston mayor raises transgender flag and says pledge of aggrievance


The "Men are Men and Women are Women" bus rolled into Boston, and the Mayor of Boston, Marty Walsh, was not pleased. The bus was staffed by activists who were spreading the word that people born as men were always men, and people born as women are always women. Yes, even Rachel Maddow.
CONTINUE READING



Search Topic Areas
o Abortion
o Economy
o Education
o Environment
o Feminists
o Phony global warming
o Gun control
o Hillary Rotten Clinton
o Homosexual agenda
o Illegal aliens
o Jeb Bush
o Marco Rubio
o Pop culture
o Radical islam
o Rand Paul
o Republicans
o Reverse Racism
o Scott Walker
o Ted Cruz
o Transvestite agenda




NewsMachete.com Copyright 2015
Feedback

RSS

Privacy policy